Shield) hinein lieu of a harness. However, Cybex states the side impact final rule did not consider CRSs that use a forward restraining surface. Cybex argued that the 25-degree dummy arm positioning required rein the new FMVSS No. 213a standard could not be met hinein forward facing CRSs with restraining http://new-kunitachi-kings.jp.net/?wptouch_switch=desktop&redirect=https://www.ledteks.com/seatbelt-and-safety-belt-webbing